Hi, Nice idea & draft. I like the idea of having the No-IPv4 option for DHCPv6. I don't like the idea of having this option in a v4 world; mainly because in mix networks where you might have some folks which only speak IPv4, imagine a case where this option is sent by a DHCPv4 to a client who do not understand v6. Of course, probably the client won't understand the option and won't turn off IPv4. There is also the chance that this is a modern OS but for some reason IPv6 was disable in the host, yes, it will understand the option No-VP6 (sent by a dhcp4). Last but not least, following this thread some of you mentioned filtering (RA, DHCP OFFER) in the switch can prevent some unwanted situations.., there are also other networks that are switch-less.
Regards, Alejandro Acosta, El 4/14/2014 10:30 AM, Simon Perreault escribió: > Dearest HOMENET, > > We are soliciting reviews for this SUNSET4 draft: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sunset4-noipv4-00 > > In a nutshell, it defines DHCPv6 and RA options indicating to the host > that IPv4 is not available. Since home networks are among those likely > to see its use, reviews coming from HOMENET would be of tremendous help. > > Thanks, > Simon > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
