On 22/04/2014 06:36, Lee Howard wrote: > > On 4/18/14 11:56 AM, "Ted Lemon" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Apr 18, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Simon Perreault >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Got it. So, summarizing, for Android, DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options would >>> likely not be problematic, but an RA option likely would. >> This is weird, though. How does a DHCPv6 client know to attempt >> configuration, if it doesn't see RAs? I just hacked around this on my >> router at home in order to get Comcast IPv6 working, but that seems >> broken. > > Depends on OS. At least one version of Windows apparently optimistically > sends DHCPv6 SOLICIT regardless of RAs.
Yep. That is neither required nor forbidden by the standards, so YMMV. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-00 Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
