Markus Stenberg <[email protected]> wrote: ` > - implemented (and also somewhat tested) 6rd, dslite, map, lw4o6 > transition mechanisms
I assume that this is all WAN/uplink interface things.
(vs ways to get IPv6 through IPv4 only internal routers...)
> And at some point it would be nice to have also:
> - multicast (sitelocal)
> - UPnP (IGD perhaps via proxy, rest via multicast and/or proxy)
> However, this brings to my mind a thing I’ve been meaning to ask the
> list for a while now.
> What is the take on hncp-00 draft format? Should the strictly optional
Are you asking specifically about the TLV format, rather than
contents/semantics?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpX9aMzFefM8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
