As an author of the naming drafts, I would like these drafts to be adopted
as WG document for the following reasons:
- the architecture document describes how to outsource DNS zone outside
the home network to any third party by re-using only existing standardized
protocols.
- the DHCP options ease the configuration of outsourcing DNS
architecture up to zero-config.
Best Regards,
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Ray Bellis <[email protected]>
wrote:
> This email commences a two week period for comments relating to the
> adoption of the following drafts by the HOMENET Working Group, as promised
> during our WG session in Toronto:
>
> draft-pfister-homenet-prefix-assignment
> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pfister-homenet-prefix-assignment/>
> draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation
> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/>
> draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options
> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/>
>
> If you have any comments please reply to this message, but please do not
> mix up comments on the PA draft and the two Naming drafts in a single reply.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ray and Mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>
>
--
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
