On Sep 19, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess that's kind of what I've been getting at: should we capture all of > this in a threats document? > I'm a little uncomfortable with the formality, but I'm even more > uncomfortable with the seeming desire > by some to sweep this all under the rug.
I think it would be worth gathering the information in a document if someone wants to write one, sure. Just talking and not gathering the results is a waste of time. I think there are a fair number of people who have ideas about how this should work. I don't know if a threats document per se is the right thing to do, but a document where this discussion is tracked and recorded would definitely be helpful. It would be a shame though if that effort derailed forward progress, as such things sometimes do. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
