On 08/10/2014 06:51, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Mark Townsley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I suggest that ANIMA focus on "professionally-managed" networks first,
> >> with "Homenet" being a secondary consideration, akin to IPv4 is in the
> >> homenet WG.
>
> > I like that suggestion, with a caveat. The caveat being that I think
> > there is room for a "professionally managed" home network as well -
> > something homenet to date has touched on, but for the most part
> > avoided.
>
> Sure; we have avoided it because I think most see the only professional
> nearby being the ISP, and few of *us* professionals want them mucking around
> in our home. That's the personal experience of IETF contributors as
> individuals.
As far as the Anima charter goes (see subject line), we need to use the
use cases to *test* the Anima technical choices (when we make them)
against the real world. So eventually we'd need all kinds of use cases,
which is why the charter mentions a wide scope. But we need to start
with a finite task, which is why the charter mentions a couple
of specific cases.
Brian
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
