Looks like a good default policy to me. So there always is at least one IPv6 prefix (if not a GUA, generate a ULA).
It still provides always-on IPv6 connectivity. And would therefore simplify protocol design and implementation. Does it seems like a better compromise to you (Mikael, Erik, Wuyts) ? - Pierre Le 14 oct. 2014 à 10:24, Markus Stenberg <[email protected]> a écrit : > On 14.10.2014, at 11.21, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Erik Kline wrote: >>> I vote no, please don't make it MUST. >> I agree, ULA should be optional, not MUST. > > If we live in the land where we ignore existing broken implementations.. > > From my point of view, it should be SHOULD _always_ generate ULA (so that > privacy oriented things in a home have a sane default without need for > trusting firewalling), and MUST generate if no GUA around. > > Keeping GUA around as long as it has valid lease lifetime is fine too, of > course. > > Cheers, > > -Markus > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
