On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Ted Lemon wrote:
Right. This is IPv4. In IPv4 we typically use a NAT on the local wire, so we get the effect we are trying to achieve either by retaining stale GUAs or using ULAs on the local wire in homenets. IPv4 also does not provide graceful renumbering, so if the ISP wants to force an IPv4 address change, they have no choice but to do flash renumbering. The UX is not good.
Just to be clear, I am against flash renumbering, I want to see renumbering done with 30-60 minute overlap at least. I however do see that we really really need to support renumbering. One way of making sure that support works is to expose applications to frequent renumbering.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
