Hi, I agree with whoever it was that said there is not enough explanation of the threat model in this draft. The result is that I really can't evaluate whether the proposed solution is complete or adequate.
The other thing that bothers me is that we need a secure homenet, not just a secure HNCP. Protecting HNCP will be pointless if the network is insecure for other reasons. So, what we *really* needs is a full homenet threat analysis. That is not to be found in the architecture RFC-to-be and is not in the WG charter, but I think it should be. Up one more level: the charter looks pretty out of date in general. Regards Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
