Re: [homenet] [Anima] ANIMA scope + homenet interaction + charter v15

Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:29:17 -0700 



> On Oct 31, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 3:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Well yes. That's exactly why in autonomic management of prefixes,
>> we need peer to peer negotiation, as in "I need 3 /64s that I
>> don't have, do you have any spare ones for me?" Maybe it's
>> badly explained but that is the whole point of our use case.
> 
> Sure, you can approach it as a sort of flood fill algorithm that tries to 
> optimize for route aggregation, but copes if that optimization doesn't pan 
> out.
> 
Do we have use cases in which the number of links is so large that unaggregated 
routing tables will be a problem?

- Ralph

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
























					Reply via email to