I think this conversation has got off on the wrong foot - the start of it was about routing protocol choice, and the other was how to interoperate with a stubby nest network in hncp.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mark Townsley <[email protected]> wrote: > > routing protocol. A technical solution was proposed and discussed > > ("proposal #1"), using the attached slides. "Proposal #2" in the > > attached slide deck explored one way to support "HNCP Fallback" plus a > > to-be-named "Routing Protocol" at the same time in a Homenet. Consensus > > I think that the two things are not mutually exclusive, or did I > mis-understand? > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > -- Dave Täht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
