Le 15 nov. 2014 à 23:33, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > >> Could you please clarify what you mean by "inject" a prefix in this context? >> Stub router sends HNCP message to non-stub router asking it to perform >> redistribution? When does the non-stub router cease redistributing? > > I was under the impression that HNCP had some kind of dead timer that would > trigger if a node went away, and when this dead timer had triggered, > redistribution would cease. > > If this isn't the case, then I have no idea how it would work. Yes, the idea would require the Low-Power to publish a route injection request in HNCP. HNCP is able to detect dead neighbors. That means Low-Power devices would need to participate in HNCP, so the feasibility depends on how small the battery is. We *really* need to clarify which kind of battery-operated devices we want to support. Because HNCP will be suitable for some, but not all of them. - If the device can run HNCP -> Proposal #1 (or any other similar route injection using HNCP) would fit - If the device can’t -> Define HNCP proxy mechanism… But I personally wouldn’t go there. - Pierre _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
