On 25.2.2015, at 0.56, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: >>> should not send packets larger than 1500 octets unless it has assurance >>> that the destination is capable of reassembling packets of that larger >>> size. >> I guess this is another MUST to be added to HNCP text (DNCP itself is >> not IPv6-specific as such). > You mean that every HNCP node MUST ba able to accept packets of up to 64kB? > What’s the status of typical embedded stacks?
Configuration dependant more than implementation at least in the few I have played with, but usually they’re really short of RAM so usually configuration is rather conservative. Sticking (say) DTLS in one is probably no-go due to lack of computing power to start with so I am not sure this is that relevant. That said, from my point of view, if this is really thought to be an issue by the WG, correct solution is to use TLS (+TCP) instead of DTLS (+UDP) in any case. Cheers, -Markus _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
