Liang, what do you mean by "multiple services"? if you mean walled garden, the homenet architecture only has the following to say:
"It should be noted that some multihoming scenarios may see one upstream being a "walled garden" and thus only appropriate for connectivity to the services of that provider; an example may be a VPN service that only routes back to the enterprise business network of a user in the homenet. As per Section 4.2.1 of [RFC3002], we do not specifically target walled-garden multihoming as a goal of this document." cheers, Ole > On 03 Mar 2015, at 10:30 , Liang Geng <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm Liang from China Mobile, a recent follower of this community. > > Following a previous thread concerning the discussion of MPVD in Homenet on > 3rd Feb, I personally think that certain use cases are quite well in line > with the mif MPVD scenario. > > As homenet architecture provides autonomic network configuration in future > multi-service, multi-homed environment, I think it is also a new challenge > in terms of CPE management. My immature thought would be that MPvD may > provide a promising model. May I propose the following problems for the list > to see if it is worthy of some serious investigation, on which hopefully > would be something interesting I could make a brief draft for further > discussion (maybe in Dallas meeting)? > > Problems to be addressed > 1. Use case of MPVD in homenet > -Single ISP, multiple services (covers single/multiple CE router(s)) > -Multiple ISP, multiple services (covers single/multiple CE > router(s)) > 2. The association of PvD and network configuration in homenet > -Address configuration > -Naming and service discovery > For both, now thinking of a new PvD TLV which enables the > association of certain configuration and PvD. Initial thought would be that > no DHCP option extension is needed terms of HNCP based pvd coveying. Host > and non-HNCP routers may refer to mif work on how pvd information is > provided. > ...more to be discussed and added > > Any comments would be extremely welcome. > > Best wishes > Liang > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
