> Or more generally, how does a stub router know that it's a stub router, > when there is no human to tell it so?
Yeah, it's not very clear. We were actually asked to describe the two protocols' support for stub networks, and nobody never told us which of the many definitions of stub network they meant, let alone describing the use case precisely. (The document uses the same definition as Cisco's EIGRP documentation, in case you're interested.) I'm imagining a dedicated device that has both a WiFi interface and a low-power interface that acts as a gateway between the Homenet network and the sensor network. Such a device would come from the factory with the low power interface configured as a stub. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
