On 22 Mar 2015, at 21:54, David Lamparter wrote:
For the comparison document, this thread is what I would expect to see for section 11, looking at "backing" for multicast routing instead of multicast routing itself.
I agree with this. The document should be talking about IS-IS supporting a multicast topology, and not using IS-IS as a multicast routing protocol.
Thanks, Chris.
Cheers, -David
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
