Hi,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:27:27PM -0500, Markus Stenberg wrote:
> Why are we trying to force exactly 1 routing protocol at any rate?
I think while we could have any number of routing protocols in there,
there MUST be one that will *always* be present, and is mandatory for a
compliant implementation. Otherwise, we'll end up with incompatible
subsets being implemented by different CPE vendors, and this is absolutely
not acceptible for a homenet solution.
Look at the mess that was made by vendors out of IPSEC - too many choices,
too many knobs, nightmares to operators, totally impossible to use in
cross-vendor scenarios for non-experts.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
