On Mar 26, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: > Markus' implementation doesn't currently do any attempt at link quality > estimation, so any pybabel-pybabel link will be treated as if it didn't > suffer any loss, which will cause long and highly lossy links to be > preferred. I'm pretty sure that would break Dave's network, we'd need to > test in a somewhat less hostile environment.
Is this not in the spec, or he just skipped this part? > As to wired nets, the only limitation I can see right now is that pybabel > doesn't disable the Linux kernel's uRPF filter, so unless you remember to > do it manually, you're going to get transient blackholes. I'll hopefully > be able to tell you more once I've finished reviewing the code and done > some testing. Is this mentioned in the spec? :) > By the way -- what Markus has written is some compact, elegant and > comprehensible code, and the comments include pointers to RFC 6126. If > you grok Python, and if you're the kind of person who understands things > better by looking at code, his is the implementation to look at. That's a huge compliment. Nice going, Markus! _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
