Concur. Even if it isn't discussed at a NG per se, NOGs should be polled for the discussion. Welcome in v6ops if there isn't a better place found.
> On May 15, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Lee Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Mark Townsley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 9:39 AM > To: Ray Bellis <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet requirements on ISPs -- should write them down? > >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Ray Bellis <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 28/04/2015 02:02, Tim Chown wrote: >>> >>> > Something for the chairs to consider. None of the above should >>> > prevent existing work continuing, but it may be useful to document >>> > common understanding of what we’re trying to achieve. >>> >>> It sounds like a fine idea to me, but I shall need to discuss with my >>> co-chair and AD when I get back to the UK next week, not least to >>> confirm whether it's in charter (and if not, whether the charter could >>> be updated to accommodate this). >> >> Ray and I have met up since his return, but haven't had a chance to talk >> about this. >> >> Let me ask: Would something like this fit better in v6ops? > > > My attitude is to write the document and then find the home for it. Our ADs > won’t let good work go undone for bureaucratic reasons; if no group is > chartered to do it, they’ll recharter one. I’m fine with pointing v6ops at > such a document and inviting discussion there, too. If there’s interest, we > could put it on the agenda for a v6ops meeting. > > On the other hand, it might be an even better discussion for a BCOP, > discussed at a NOG. Then you’ll get ISP input. > > Lee > >> >> - Mark >> >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> homenet mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet> >> >> _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
