Hi, I believe draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation [1] , draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options [2] have addressed all comments we received so far. I believe these document are ready.
draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-02 addresses the renumbering issue and added significant text in the security considerations section. So, please have a look these sections. draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt. The only changes from the previous version is the replacement of master/slave by primary/secondary. Feel free to provide feed backs! BR, Daniel [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-02 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02 -----Original Message----- From: homenet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:59 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Home Networking Working Group of the IETF. Title : DHCP Options for Homenet Naming Architecture Authors : Daniel Migault Wouter Cloetens Chris Griffiths Ralf Weber Filename : draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02.txt Pages : 28 Date : 2015-05-19 Abstract: CPEs are usually constraint devices with reduced network and CPU capacities. As such, a CPE hosting on the Internet the authoritative naming service for its home network may become vulnerable to resource exhaustion attacks. One way to avoid exposing CPE is to outsource the authoritative service to a third party. This third party can be the ISP or any other independent third party. Outsourcing the authoritative naming service to a third party requires setting up an architecture which may be unappropriated for most end users. To leverage this issue, this document proposes DHCP Options so any agnostic CPE can automatically proceed to the appropriated configuration and outsource the authoritative naming service for the home network. This document shows that in most cases, these DHCP Options make outsourcing to a third party (be it the ISP or any ISP independent service provider) transparent for the end user. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
