You don't define ad-hoc interfaces. From Section 4, it would seem
that these are for non-transitive links with no prefix assignment (a
la AHCP), but in that case some changes may be needed to DNCP,
In it's current form the adhoc-interface category in-fact results in an
assignment of a /64 per EACH adhoc-interface
I see.
So is that meant to support non-transitive links, or something else? If
the former, I'll need to go through the DNCP draft and stare at the places
that seem to assume transitivity until grokking comes.
In any case, you need to provide some rationale and implementation
guidance for the ad-hoc interface type.
Sections 7.2 and 7.4: why announce a route for each subnet? We've got
redirects for that.
I think you misread that. The text says to announce one route per
"delegated prefix"
Right. Am I the only person who got confused by that?
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
