On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Ray Bellis wrote:

This email marks the commencement of a three-week Working Group Last
Call for draft-ietf-homenet-hncp.

Please get any final comments in to the authors (cc: the WG) as soon as
possible.

If I understand correctly, work is now ongoing to create a separate implementation of HNCP? This would be a good step to address my concern I have voiced privately to the authors that not enough people have gone through the document. I also find them hard to read (some parts have been changed after I gave this feedback) and it uses terminology that might benefit from further explanation and/or making examples what they mean. For instance, the section about "common link" (section 4). Upon reading this, I think I understand that this applies to for instance a shared ethernet segment where both can see each others HNCP packets. Having an example here about why things are done, what problems are solved etc, would probably make it easier to understand rationale for the choices.

6.2.4 "create an on-link route"? What's an on-link route? Also, why is it a "MAY" that it doesn't create an address for itself to this prefix? An explanation and rationale here would be good.

6.2.6 The list of things to do there isn't clear to me. "wait for them to be applied"? Applied where? How? Using the HCNP Prefix Assignment Algorithm? In the RIB? It implies HNCP Prefix Assignment Algo afterwards, but this isn't clear to me.

Section 11 about the MUST for RFC7084 compliance. What parts of RFC7084 must be implemented? MUSTs? SHOULDs?

I personally think this WGLC is premature. I will not oppose it going forward, but I have concerns that the document(s) isn't ready for shipping off as RFCs yet due to not enough people having read them.

So I think I am basically saying that the documents are probably correct, but there is still very valuable information still only in the heads of the implementors that has not been written down in the document, that would be valuable to have in there and that would also help future implementors who might be reading the document trying to understand what's going on, why things are done the way they are, etc.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to