Hi, > Stateless assignment based on Modified EUI64 interface identifiers > [RFC4291] SHOULD be used for address assignment whenever possible,
This is new and problematic. EUI64 is pretty much deprecated now, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-address-generation-privacy-07 (in IETF Last Call) for background, and https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7217 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-04 for the way forward. > otherwise (e.g., for IPv4) the following method MUST be used instead: > For any assigned prefix for which SLAAC cannot be used, the first > quarter of the addresses are reserved for routers HNCP based address > assignments, whereas the last three quarters are left to the DHCPv6 That would only be acceptable, I think, if you also specify that pseudo-random allocation is used within the 1/4 and 3/4 of the addresses (referring to IPv6 only). Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
