(Cc's restored) On 10/07/2015 03:55, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> The draft defines TLVs. To me that means it's somewhat more than an >> "algorithm". > > Yes, which is why I wrote "as well as a suggested packet format to be used > by such protocols".
It isn't a "suggested" TLV format. It's fully specified with IANA Considerations and all that. IMHO this is clearly a protocol, although I share Les's doubts about its maturity. On the other hand, it's only going for Proposed Standard at first, and it isn't a routing protocol, although it walks and quacks* a bit like one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
