> Didn't we have a thread on 7.2 a few days ago, already?
> At least I feel like having a slight deja-vu replying.
That was before I started implementing, while these are my conclusions
after implementing. Obviously, there's a lot of overlap.
Sorry if I'm spamming, but I've been criticised before for having private
discussions without CC-ing half the universe. TINC.
> Please read into 7084, Section 7.2 will hopefully go away entirely.
Not a good idea, 7.2 is fairly easy to read and comprehend, 7084 is a mess
of mostly irrelevant recommendations with no rationale. I recommend
keeping it, but making it clear that these are informative recommendations
and that The Truth is in 7084.
>> (1) Does that mean a default route advertised in the Homenet routing
>> protocol, or do non-Homenet default routes count?
> All do, imagine you are the only (edge) router and your default route
> comes from your ISP via RAs.
Then you should be advertising this route over the routing protocol, no?
> Snooping the IGP is not an option. You may not even run an IGP,
> e.g. if you are an isolated node with only ISP and client connectivity.
In Section 11 you say
o It MUST implement and run a routing protocol appropriate for the
given link type on all of the interfaces it sends and receives
HNCP traffic on.
Obviously, you could be speaking HNCP on an empty set of interfaces, but
that's not a case I'm going to loose much sleep on.
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
