On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:44:52PM +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Do you need DHCPv4 Subnet Allocation and/or IPv4 Router Advertisements > (RFC6656 and RFC1256)?
hncp-07 section 7.4 says: [...] The winner is the router (connected to the Common Link) advertising the greatest L-capability. [...] The elected router MUST provide DHCPv4 services on the given link. hncp-07 section 10 says on the election: [...] between 1 and 7 included (4 is the default) if the router is capable of running a legacy DHCPv4 server offering IPv4 addresses to clients and 0 otherwise. [...] So, L=0 implies the router can't do a DHCPv4 server. And if you have a link where all routers have L=0, there will not be DHCPv4 on that link. (Which is, I guess, how you would do sunset4?) Not sure if any of this is changing in -08; I do agree with Alexandru in that there is a need for a mechanism to ditch IPv4 for individual v6-only devices or complete v6-only homenets. NB: Prefix assignment is a different question. -David _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
