Hi Sander,
On 23/07/2015 04:06, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
>> If that makes sense (for any value of IsBabeliS) I don't think we have a
>> problem.
>> I would suggesting adding text near the beginning stating that HNCP is
>> agnostic
>> about the routing protocol, but that a single routing protocol must be used.
>
> And that "single routing protocol" is ... ???
Irrelevant to *this* discussion. If we want to get the HNCP draft out of the
door,
we need it to be independent of the choice.
> This basically just ignores the problem
No it doesn't. It says that it's an orthogonal problem.
> that a routing protocol must be chosen and might even open the door to vendor
> A saying "our single routing protocol is X" and vendor B saying "our single
> routing protocol is Y". This decision has to be made at some point...
Yes, but it's a different decision from "Do we have consensus on HNCP?".
Brian
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
