> I understand that there is some desire to write "modular" documents, and > I don't object whatever routing protocol is used being documented in > a different RFC than the HNCP protocol.
Margaret, You're entirely right, but I would still argue in favour of going forward with HNCP. HNCP is a fine protocol, and I would really like to see it published. Of course, I'd like to see it published with a choice of routing protocol, but that is not likely to happen soon, for many reasons (one of those being that we don't know yet if there is consensus in the IS-IS community around Lamparter's latest draft -- and without that, there's no usable IS-IS spec). (One thing you can do to help is to get people like Hopps and Gredler to review Lamparter's work.) Let's please not keep HNCP hostage to the routing protocol issue -- let's get it published soon. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
