On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ole Troan wrote:
For DHCPv6 these contraints do not apply anymore. That's what I'm trying to
figure out, how do we handle these IA_NAs and IA_PDs that are not within an
on-link RA being sent for that prefix.
I take it IA_PD was included above by mistake.
No.
This is definitely not a configuration error, it's perfectly valid to hand out
single address using DHCPv6 IA_NA that isn't covered by an off-link or on-link
prefix.
true. but I’m not sure what bearing that has with the host rule in question.
I’m also wondering if you are making a wrong assumption of what an L=0 PIO
entails.
I don't know. Am I?
I still don't understand what a host with an IA_NA or IA_PD that isn't
covered by an on-link PIO should do with a packet sourced from those
IA_NA/IA_PD addresses. Yes, I do believe this to be a very valid case.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
