On 20/08/2015 08:02, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Why are HNCP codepoints specified as "standards action"? It's a 16-bit
> space, wouldn't "documentation required" be good enough? Or even FCFS?
With my RFC6709 hat on, I would advocate a fairly strict policy for
extending something that walks and quacks like a routing protocol.
Some sort of review seems advisable. In RFC5226 terms, I'd go for
Expert Review at least.
Brian
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
