On 10/21/15 5:29 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Henning Rogge <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >>> is it up from 8? >>> >>> Dave Täht >> >> I did experiments in the CORE network emulator with shncpd... not sure >> if this counts. >> >> Henning Rogge > > It counts! Has the channel assignment problem been solved in any way? > > Dave Täht > I just lost five years of my life to making wifi better. And, now... > the FCC wants to make my work, illegal for people to install.
Dear Dave, I share your concerns. Perhaps DD-WRT could include a canned library with a flexible API. Perhaps we should defined this API and not settle for something like NDIS. An API that isolates power related adjustment code to meet regulator requirements. We have lived through the regulator hell in the recent past. It was not pleasant. Once specifications become clear, we also hope to do testing. Are there good places to find code implementing homenet dncp with scalable DNS-SD, and versions running ISIS with scalable DNS-SD as well? I would assume wifi running ISIS also blocks port 5353 traffic at the bridge. What is your opinion on a good router for testing? Not necessarily the cheapest because performance is also important. Should I look for the best DD-WRT hardware running linux before these units are removed from the home market? My fear is testing may soon require a license and expensive custom hardware. After all, ham operators are granted a fairly large latitude in the equipment they manage, most of it fairly programmable in many critical aspects. A 4 watt handheld transmitter costs less than $30 and comes with software needed to program aspects like channel separation. Regards, Douglas Otis _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
