Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> writes: > Hear, hear! > > We have spent far too much time arguing about this, and I am happy we have a > conclusion. A big thank you to the chairs for calling making this call. I > strongly agree that given the dynamics of the home networking market, there > needs to be one, and only one, routing protocol. I don't see anything else > working in the real world. > > Personally, I happen to think that babel is the best choice, not so much > because > of the protocol itself but because of the current availability of solid, > freely-licensed, small-footprint implementations. But IS-IS would have been > fine > as well; so would OSPF, if there had been an implementation, and even HNCP > fallback would have fine. At the end of the day it doesn't really matter which > one we choose, as long as we choose one. > > Let's hope that this will stop the arguments and we can all get on with > implementation and deployment.
+1 -Toke _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
