>   (2) SHOULD RFC 6126, IPv4 subset;

Why not MUST? Given the massive embedded base (and continued deployment of new) 
IPv4-only devices, I think the homenet architecture will be less than 
successful if IPv4 isn't mandatory to implement. It's ok for vendors to ship 
with IPv4 disabled by default, if that's what the vendor wants to do; but it 
has to be there.

Much as I would like to see the CE industry prodded to ship all products with 
IPv6 implemented and enabled, I don't think the prodding should be done by 
causing unnecessary pain for average consumers.
Barbara

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to