> So the naming protocol has to work with renumbering; ideally though > intra-homenet communications would use the homenet's ULA,
That's not the point I'm making. I mean that numbers are not user-visible, while names obviously are. That would seem to imply that naming is at a higher level than either numbering or routing. (I'm pretty sure there's a paper by Clark on the subject somewhere.) I'm curious why you think otherwise. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
