> The draft states: > "The top-level domain name '.homenet.' is to be used for naming within > a home network. Names ending with '.homenet.' MUST refer to > services that are located within a home network (e.g., a printer, or > a toaster)." > > Which I think is more correct and hopefully less ambiguous.
My comment was that I find the term "home network" ambiguous. Given this is a "MUST", I would like if either (1) "home network" was defined (Stuart proposed one possible definition, which I think may have problems, but would prefer to see that proposed definition in a written form before judging; I suggested using something like the Internal/External interface definitions of RFC 7788, but people didn't like that idea), or (2) it was made clear that identifying whether an interface served as a home network boundary was left to the implementer. Barbara _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
