On 30/03/2017 10:04, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> There's already a thing called an HNCP agent. Why couldn't >> it be enhanced to negotiate with an upstream ASA for resources? > > Could you please clarify what you mean by "negotiate"? Current HNCP > implementations are provided with a bunch of External Prefixes, which they > then carve into /64, one per prefix. Are you envisioning a scenario where > the HNCP implementation actually performs active negotiation on its > external interfaces?
Yes. But if it's a useless use case, that's fine. I was motivated to point out that there *really* is no conflict between the homenet work and Anima, and that they could be complementary if we want. Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
