Your second suggestion is what I meant.  Thanks for taking the time to write 
it—I totally missed the conflicting meaning of "validate". 

> On Jul 7, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I have read the -09 draft.  I think I am confused (but maybe I am
> confused about that).
> 
> It says
> 
>   5.  No special processing of '.home.arpa' is required for
>       authoritative DNS server implementations.  However, it is
>       possible that an authoritative DNS server might attempt to
>       validate the delegation for a zone before answering
>       authoritatively for that zone.  In this situation, it would find
>       an invalid delegation, and would not answer authoritatively.  A
>       server that implements this sort of check MUST be configurable so
>       that either it does not do this check for the 'home.arpa' domain,
>       or it ignores the results of the check.
> 
> I think the problem here might be "attempt to validate".  Since the
> point of section 7 is precisely to permit DNSSEC validation not to
> "fail" (i.e. not to validate "bogus"), this seems to be an
> equivocation on "validate".  I think what is probably meant is
> 
>    It is possible that an authoritative DNS server might have local
>    policy that requires positive DNSSEC validation of a delegation
>    for a zone before answering authoritatively for that zone.  In
>    that situation, it would not find a signed delegation, and would
>    therefore not answer authoritiatively.  A server …
> 
> If that's not what's meant, then I don't know what is meant.  The
> delegation is certainly not invalid in the DNSSEC sense.  It's not
> possible to find it in the global DNS servers authoritative for the
> parent name space, however.  If _that's_ the worry, then the term
> "valid" is not what is needed here.  In that case, maybe this is
> what's wanted:
> 
>    It is possible that an authoritative DNS server might attempt to
>    check the authoritative servers for home.arpa. for a delegation
>    beneath that name before answering authoritatively for such a
>    delegated name.  In such a case, because the name always has only
>    local significance there will be no such delegation in the
>    home.arpa. zone, and so the server would refuse to answer
>    authoritatively for such a zone.  A server …
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to