With one day left in CFA for draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming, here is my 
summary of what I think I've read.

Exactly 3 people have expressed support for adoption (Daniel [author], Michael 
R, James). Hmm. That's not a lot.

Juliusz expressed opposition to adoption, but Ray and Michael said the 
reasoning for objection was flawed (that Juliusz was setting the bar too high 
and the procedural objections were not valid in the context of IETF 
procedures). Ray said the purpose of a CFA is "to get agreement that a document 
is an appropriate direction for the WG to explore, even if it might require 
substantial work".
Ted [author] said he thought it might be reasonable to put the CFA on hold 
until Daniel did another update.
Tim C said he thought it was early for adoption (for this and related dnssd 

I hope I got this summary right. Did I miss anything important?
Does anyone else have an opinion? Does anyone who has expressed an opinion want 
to express a new and different opinion?

homenet mailing list

Reply via email to