> Juliusz expressed opposition to adoption, but Ray and Michael said the
> reasoning for objection was flawed (that Juliusz was setting the bar too
> high and the procedural objections were not valid in the context of IETF
> procedures).

I probably expressed myself badly -- my objections were technical, not

In simple terms, I said "Why don't we try implementing bits of this
document before we adopt".  I never said "We need seven interoperable
independent implementations before adoption".

-- Juliusz

homenet mailing list

Reply via email to