> Juliusz expressed opposition to adoption, but Ray and Michael said the > reasoning for objection was flawed (that Juliusz was setting the bar too > high and the procedural objections were not valid in the context of IETF > procedures).
I probably expressed myself badly -- my objections were technical, not procedural. In simple terms, I said "Why don't we try implementing bits of this document before we adopt". I never said "We need seven interoperable independent implementations before adoption". -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
