> On 11 Aug 2017, at 17:53, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: >> Source-specific routing, however, is an incomplete solution. Having >> chosen the correct route based on the source address, we still have the >> problem that one provider connection may be better than another for >> connecting to a particular destination, and there may be no way to >> figure that out using the default source address selection algorithm, >> or even by using a more detailed source address selection algorithm >> configured by DHCP. Indeed, this is likely, not unlikely. > > My problem with the MPVD solution is that it seems incomplete too. > > The example that, in contrast to all other content, is when content is > zero-rated via 3G but not via WIFI. (generalized to any two uplinks) > I don't know the source address selection or source routing can deal with > that problem period. > > It seems to me that we are re-inventing SHIM6, trying in vain to pretend we > never heard of that. And I still don't understand why it was killed.
Extension headers. > But, again, I want to adopt the document so that we can argue about this > as part of our charter work. Indeed! Tim _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet