Hiya, On 24/01/18 02:48, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > - Does this sound roughly right or off the wall? > > It sounds right. > I think that bootstrap of security should become an recharter item in the > future. Some kind of BCP on interactions with MUD, SUIT, etc. IN THE > FUTURE. NOT NOW.
Can you say more? Eg. what would be needed before you think it'd be sensible for homenet to start work in this space? > > > 2. We have this milestone in our charter: > > > "Nov 2018 - Submission of the perimeter security draft > > to the IESG as Informational RFC" > > Yes. Are the authors still engaged? I'm not aware that we have authors;-( I guess someone could have volunteered in the past before I was helping out as chair (if so, please do let us know). Cheers, S. > I think I've missed the last three homenet WG sessions due to conflicts. > I find that the ML is too frequently ratholed when it isn't silent. > > > - Does the homenet wg need to profile use of those > > security mechanisms, for example to document a way to > > establish initial keying material that we'd like to see > > implemented when those protocols are used in home networks? > > > - If so, (and without yet getting into discussions about ToFU > > etc) do we have people who are interested in working on > > that? > > Yes, but not yet. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > -- PGP key change time for me. New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2 expires Jan 24 2018. NewWithOld sigs in keyservers. Sorry if that mucks something up;-)
0x7B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
