Makes sense to me…
From: Ted Lemon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 7:41 AM To: Border, John <[email protected]> Cc: HOMENET <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [homenet] Simple Naming and DNS Privacy WARNING: The sender of this email could not be validated and may not match the person in the "From" field. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think the right way to approach this question is to try to write a security model. On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 09:54 Border, John <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Does the simple naming architecture need to deal with DNS privacy using port 853? Subject to the success of the security boundaries, the home network can be considered as already being private to some extent. But, my devices are mobile and will move in and out of the home network and may have DNS privacy use enabled for outside use. John _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_homenet&d=DwMFaQ&c=dIKa1mMv92xhhFzVXv5A3Q&r=9F44ji63_2hvW5HufmlpP-DFKXuFy4jDtL5PXwKlTqg&m=wURh4Aew7ytCmqHZSHliUoRRqENshjEMp6P1bgiTm70&s=CIso4XJsQKCZtK-IokzCXcuZeyKqaVu8KudmE7wJPDc&e=>
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
