Hello Julius,
this was indeed a bit rapidly written.
And effectively, Markus identified what I meant. Thank you.
-m
Le 2018-05-07 à 21:34, Markus Stenberg a écrit :
On 7 May 2018, at 22.30, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote:
you should refer to 8174.
Perhaps you could kindly justify your advice? Non-capitalised "must" is
used just once in this document, and I don't see any opportunity for
ambiguity.
Perhaps he refers to the RFC8174 update to the boilerplate:
=== OLD ===
..
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
=== NEW ===
..
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.
=== END ===
-Markus
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
