On 08.11.2018, at 19.16, Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From a user perspective, there are a few problems:
>> When an interface goes down and then up again, it's renumbered. This
>> includes reboots.
> That shouldn't happen as long as there remains at least one Homenet router
> to maintain the prefix (see Section 4.1 point 3 of RFC 7695).
> 
> I believe that hnetd (but not shncpd) additionally supports some mechanism
> to handle the case where there are no routers left to maintain the prefix,
> but I'm less sure.

In hnetd there are actually two mechanisms fo ensure prefixes come up back the 
same they were before;

- storage of assigned prefixes (if enabled; if use of flash writes is not 
desired this is not used obviously), and

- ~determinstic pseudo-random assignment on interfaces

If both fail, that's probably a bug, although not sure if both options can be 
off if configured so. Fallback is purely random assignment out of prefix.

Anyway, getting back to topic of Ted's passionate speech about bad HNCP 
implementations, I'd love to see him (or someone else) provide better one :-)

Cheers,

-Markus

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to