STARK, BARBARA H <[email protected]> wrote: > I've uploaded a draft of the IETF 104 meeting minutes. Please let us > chairs know if you have comments. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/minutes-104-homenet-00
Thanks. I read your minutes, as I was double booked, and could not attend in person. I will watch the video next week. > should we re-charter? are we failing to discuss these things because we > believe they're out of scope? I don't really feel that the charter has limited who has said what. I think that just the opposite. If anything, we have in past had long-winded debates without clear resolution. That's stopped mostly because some of those involved have either gotten tired, or have moved on in their career. > What could be done that would get people more active on the mailing list? > Hum on re-chartering - room prefers to attempt re-chartering; needs to be > confirmed on the mailing list. It has been suggested that my https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-smarkaklink/ more properly fits into homenet. I admit that I hadn't thought of that, as I didn't think it was in scope. Perhaps it is. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
