STARK, BARBARA H <[email protected]> wrote: > I am involved in the joint BBF effort that they mentioned. If someone > wanted to join that project (it's free to join -- just requires > agreeing to IPR policy and BSD+Patent open source license) and suggest > and provide code for HNCP, they could.
I will followup with you, unicast.
> But since this is a purely Layer
> 2 network (routers will break it), the HNCP would really only be for
> other routers (e.g., IoT gateways attaching a Thread network) that
> aren't part of the Multi AP L2 network. If you'd like more info for
> joining the joint BBF/prpl project, let me know.
If the border routers are on the same L2 as the extensions, then it shouldn't
be a problem. If there is a more complex HNCP network, then we could
probably simulate the L2 scenario with VXLAN, configured by HNCP.
There are probably some advantages to doing that as well.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
