> It would seem your objection can be summarized as "we don't need this". > Correct me if I'm wrong.
No, my objection is that I cannot see how that can work in a decentralised manner -- with no central Homenet controller. > To me is like saying we don't need a new routing protocol like BABEL, because > we have loads of routing protocols already. > [for the record I strongly supported incorporating BABEL into Homenet, > because to me it was the best choice] When we argued between Babel and IS-IS, we were deciding between two decentralised protocols. In some sense, we were having an argument among friends -- had someone suggested we use a central SDN controller instead of a distributed routing protocol, we'd probably have ganged on the culprit. If that's okay, I'll give a more detailed description of my objection as a followup to MCR's comment, since the two of you are saying very roughly the same thing. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
