TBH I don’t know anything about OBA other than that I heard it discussed.  If 
you want to write up a draft, that can’t hurt.   I’m not promising to support 
it—it depends on what you come up with.   But it’s always good to have a place 
to start, and something to pick apart and fix up.   So by all means, if you are 
willing to proceed on that basis, I think it’s a good idea, and I will read it.

> On Jun 13, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/13/19 12:02 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Jun 13, 2019, at 2:57 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> The meta-question is whether there is something to be done here, and if 
>>> this wg is the right place to do it. I know there was a security part of 
>>> the charter... it sure would be nice to set an example for all of this IoT 
>>> mischief on how to do a proper web login interface.
>>> 
>>> 
>> This is a general problem, not an IoT problem.  IoT is a good motivating use 
>> case, not the complete problem.   We’ve talked about working on this problem 
>> here before. I think it’s in scope and this is a good place to do it.  Iff 
>> people are willing to participate!
>> 
>> 
> 
> Should I write up a draft? It would be really good that something 
> (convergent) evolved out Stephen, Paul and my rfc 7486, as the first thing I 
> experimented on was something for a home router based application :)
> 
> Mike, who has no idea if the webauth folks had any idea about our hoba stuff.
> 

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to