I agree, however, think that we are moving toward what we want to implement, though with various level of integrations. My point was that we come with a description that works for different use cases and extensions. Yours, Daniel
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 18, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Migault <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am also questioning on whether we should provide some sort of > recommendations for the UI. While we are not UI designers, I believe some > properties could be interesting for designers, and those may be helpful to > be provided. > > > The trouble that we have gotten into repeatedly in this working group is > that we write the specification in anticipation of an implementation, > rather than on the basis of experience doing an implementation. We have a > fantastic testbed for this: OpenWRT. I am at this point somewhat expert > in doing OpenWRT builds. Rather than speculating about what we need to > say, why not do an implementation, see how it works, and then do a writeup > based on what we learned? We’re already talking about doing this at the > Hackathon. > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
