Or “Distribution Primary?” I think given this chart that “Distribution Authority” is less clear, since the real authority is the stealth primary.
> On May 5, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: >> On May 5, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> 3) We would be happy to go with another term, but we don't want to >>> invent another term. So, if the DNS anycast operator has another >>> term, then I'd go with it. > >> Authority database? > > I thought that you were asking who was an authoritive database of operators. > Then I understood that you are suggesting "authority database" as the term. > > Some ascii art, (so pick a sensible mono-spaced font, or use the archive > link): > > .-----. .-----. > | S P | ---> | D M |----\-------\------\ > `-----' `-----' | | | > V V V > .-----. .----. .----. > | Sec | | Sec| |Sec | > `-----' `----' `----' > > S.P. = Stealth Primary > Sec = Secondary > D M = Distribution M* > > Note that the "DM" is usually not listed as an NS, but rather, > two or more "Sec" are what is listed. > > So, maybe "Distribution Authority" would make us both happy. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
